מעורב הופס ליום חמישי על הבוקר / מנחם לס

*אחד התנאים של פיל ג'קסון לג'וב של ניו יורק הוא שהוא המחליט היחיד בקשר למאמן. דיווחים שקבלתי הם שג'קסון ימנה את סטיב קאר כמאמן הניקס לעונה הבאה. ההצלחה של ג'ף הורנסק היא-היא אחת הסיבות לבחירה של קאר כי ג'קסון כבר אמר שהוא "מעדיף שחקנים ששיחקו גארדים בליגה, אנשים כג'ון סטוקטון, בריאן שואו, וסטיב קאר.

* קובי בריאנט אחר – לפי שון דבני מספורטינג ניוז – ש-"אין לו כל 'עניין' לשחק עבור מייק ד'אנטוני בעונה הבאה.

*דברנו על זה מספיק, ועכשיו גם הקומיסיונר אדם סילבר אומר שב-NBA אין בכלל דבר כזה 'טנקינג' רק REBUILDING. בראיון שנתן ב-http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/03/12/commissioner-adam-silver-says-what-is-happening-in-nba-is-rebuilding-not-tanking/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

תקראו את המאמר עם הכותרת

Commissioner Adam Silver says what is happening in NBA is rebuilding, not tanking

תבינו גם אתם מה שאני מנסה להסביר לכם כבר 6 חודשים, וכמעט הכל ללא הצלחה.

*לברון ג'יימס אמר לפני משחק ההיט נגד הנטס שהוא "מוכן להתערב עם כל מי שרוצה – כולל הוכחות למי שמבין בסמרטפונים – שהסמרטפון של סמסונג הוא הטוב ביותר בשוק. כמובן שהעובדה שהוא איש הפרחים שלהם לא מזיקה, אבל "להוכיח"? ז"א שיש לו הבנה בסמרטפונים.

*העתון סיאטל טיימס ערך משאל בין קוראיו לבחור את עשרת שחקני הסוניקס (ת'אנדר* הגדולים בכל הזמנים. התוצאה? 1. גארי פייטון, 2. קווין דוראנט, 3. ג'ק סיקמה, 4. שון קמפ, 5. פרד בראון, 6. ספנסר הייווד, 7. דייל אליס, 8. ראסל ווסטברוק, 9. ריי אלן, 10. דלף שרמפ

*לפי דיווחים מדיילי נווז, פיל ג'קסון ישתכר 15 מיליון כנשיא הניקס.

*עוד לפי דיילי ניוז, פיל ג'קסון ביקש הבטחה מהניקס  שכרמלו אנטוני נשאר איתם לפני שהוא חותם.

*קיירי אירוינג אמר לעתון קליבלנד פליין דילר ש-"אנטוני בנט יהיה אחד מכוכבי הקבוצה בשנה הבאה".

*קווין לאב ליוטה? הנה כמה שאלות ותשובות מעניינות עם גורדון הייווארד:

Are you surprised the core five young guys — you, Trey Burke, Derrick Favors, Enes Kanter, and Alec Burks — haven’t played much as a lineup? I don’t think you guys have cracked even 50 minutes together. [Editor's note: They're actually at 52 after Monday.] That’s an intriguing group, right?

Yeah, it is. I don’t know if I’m surprised. It’s just whatever Coach has felt like has given us the best chance to win games. And for whatever reason, with that lineup, it hasn’t been the case.

Do you care about playing shooting guard or small forward? You start at shooting guard, but when Alec comes in, you shift over to small forward.

It doesn’t matter to me. It’s all just about matchups. The 2 and 3 are basically the same thing.

I hear that there is a fair chance to get Kevin Love. Have you heard of it??

I mean, we’ll see. Eveybody talks about it

*אדם סילבר אמר שכמעט כולם בעד הגבלת גיל כניסה ל-NBA לגיל 20 מינימום. הדבר היחיד שמעכב את ההחלטה הוא בחירת מנכ"ל לאיגוד השחקנים.

מנחם לס

מנהל הופס. הזקן והוותיק מכולם בצוות. מנסה לכתוב יומית - כל זמן שאוכל!

לפוסט הזה יש 27 תגובות

  3. אשך טמיר המקורי

    13 מרץ 2014 06:38:04

    וואו, אם סטיב קאר מתמנה למאמן שלהם אני עובר לאהוב אותם בגדול. הוא יוביל אותם לתקופה היפה הבאה, אחרי תקופת ריילי וון-גנדי.

    הגיע הזמן באמת שקובי ישים את הבולבול על השולחן וייפטר מהפרינגלס הזה.

    לברון הוא מבין גדול בסמרטפונים. כמו שעזית חשפה, הוא ובוש פיתחו ליין של סמרטפונים עמידים למים, עם עיצוב מושלם שמתאים לרקטום האנושי ורטט חזק במיוחד. והוא מסוגל להוכיח זאת בסירטון למי שרוצה!

    תודה על כל העדכונים המעניינים!

    1. עזית, בת מל מלך, עשויה מאבנים טובות

      13 מרץ 2014 08:42:00

      ממה שכותבים בפורומים גירסת ביטא כבר זמינה לשימוש
      ותחובה עמוק בישבנם של הנסיינים האמיצים.
      למעשה שמעתי טענה שזו הסיבה העיקרית לשיפור אצל בוש וויד לאחרונה.
      כל פעולה חיובית על המגרש מתורגמת לעיסוי מענג של בלוטת הערמונית
      כי ללברון יש את המספר שלהם

      1. עזית, בת מל מלך, עשויה מאבנים טובות

        13 מרץ 2014 08:46:29

        אבל מישהו צריך להגיד ללברון בעדינות שכדאי שיניח קצת לעיסוק שלו
        בטכנולוגיה ומעשי סדום ויחזור לתת את הכל על המגרש כי מיאמי לא נראים משהו

  4. Mbk

    13 מרץ 2014 08:07:38

    לברון הוסיף סיבה 11 לאשך לשנוא אותו
    מה שהתחיל כפוסט תמים ומשעשע יגמר בספר עם תפוצה בינלאומית ותביעת דיבה מתוקשרת
    לברון מבין בסמרטפונים כמו שאני מבין במסלולי נדידית חסידות בעונת המעבר
    שאין משהו חכם להגיד כדאי פשוט לשתוק

    *נשלח מהסמסונג שלי

  5. נתן גולד

    13 מרץ 2014 08:08:32

    בנייה מחדש הכוללת הסתמכות על בחירות דראפט שיבואו מתוך הבנייה מחדש נקראת טנקינג. לא ראיתי אף קבוצה עושה "בנייה מחדש" כל כך מאסיבית שנה שעברה. אני לא מבין איך אפשר להסתכל על קבוצה כמו פילדלפיה, שעושה בערך הכול כדי להיות במקום אחרון בליגה ולהגיד שהיא לא לוטשת עיניים לוויגינס/פארקר/אמביד.

  6. יוסי

    13 מרץ 2014 08:09:09

    פיל גדול בתור מאמן לא בתור ג"מ .. ולא צריך להיות גאון בשביל לעשות סדר בבלגן .. לוותר על העונה לא להחתים את מלו בדרפט שנה הבאה יש כמה שחקנים טובים ולחכות לקיץ 2016 שאולי דוראנט ירצה לעזוב את אוקלהומה …לא מאמין שזה מה שיעשו כי תמיד הם עושים שטויות יחתימו את מלו ויעשו טרייד על סטודמאייר תמורת גורדון הבינוני והחוזה הגרוע שלו..

  10. k_700

    13 מרץ 2014 10:49:13

    אתמול ראיתי ראיון אחד על אחד עם אסד, הוא אשכרה ישב שעה וחצי עם כתב, עם הצחוק השטני שלו שמתחבא מתחת לשפם, חזר ואמר שאין לו מושג על איזה רצח עם מדברים בכל העולם.

    הוא בסך הכל שמע על "כמה משוגעים שהרגו כמה משוגעים אחרים" אבל לא משהו שצריך להטריד את העולם.

    ראיתי ומיד קיבלתי פלאשבקים לאדם סילבר.

  11. k_700

    13 מרץ 2014 11:02:07

    מנחם,

    אודה לך אם תשלוף לנו מהאינסיידר את הכתבה החשובה הזאת:
    http://insider.espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/10584873/bilas-goodman-lots-winners-nba-age-change-college-basketball

    זה צריך להיות טור מעניין בקשר לחוק שמגביל כניסה לליגה שסילבר הציע.
    (חוק דבילי מאוד לדעתי).

    בקיצור נודה לך אם תשלוף אותו ותפרסם פה.

    1. מנחם לס

      13 מרץ 2014 16:03:27

      NBA age change winners
      Plenty stand to benefit from potential increase in NBA's entry age
      Updated: March 11, 2014, 4:26 PM ET
      By Jay Bilas and Jeff Goodman | ESPN Insider
      41
      1
      28
      EMAIL
      PRINT
      Adam Silver
      AP Photo/Bill Haber
      Adam Silver has shown interest in working with the NBPA to increase the league's minimum age.
      Each week during the college basketball season, ESPN Insiders Jay Bilas and Jeff Goodman will weigh in on the biggest questions of the sport. In a special edition this week, the duo break down the implications of a potential increase to the NBA's entry age.

      The discussion: Whom do you see as the winners if such a change is enacted? Any losers?
      Jay Bilas: If the NBA and National Basketball Players Association are able to agree upon a draft eligibility rule of 20 years old and two years removed from high school, it would be a positive for all levels of basketball, especially the NBA.

      Right now, the NBA wastes money on the development of young talent that is simply not prepared to make an immediate impact. With another year added to the current age limit, the NBA will be able to make better decisions in scouting and drafting, and eliminate some significant risk. In addition, the players will be more mature and more prepared, on and off the court.

      Debating the NBA age restriction

      Tuesday, March 11
      Chad Ford: The good, bad and ugly of increasing the NBA age restriction. Read

      Jay Bilas/Jeff Goodman: Winners and losers of upping the age restriction. Read

      Amin Elhassan: Why an age restriction works. Read

      Kevin Pelton: How the NBA develops players better than the NCAA. Read

      Wednesday, March 12
      Tom Haberstroh: The case for one-and-dones. Read

      Chad Ford: No-freshmen lottery mock draft. Read

      Jeff Goodman: Projecting Duke, Kansas if their freshmen stay. Read

      NBA teams will get more players who will be able to make an immediate impact, and it will preserve more veteran jobs. The quality of play in the NBA would improve, and roster spots would not be taken up by players who are not prepared to contribute immediately.

      There would be no losers in this, just winners. Clearly, an increased age limit will benefit college basketball by keeping marquee talent in the college game for a longer period of time. There would be a greater degree of certainty on every level of the game. But, as a policy matter, it also greatly benefits the players.

      For most young players, the college experience (not just in the classroom) is the best thing, and is far superior to the D-League or playing professionally overseas. Right now, the game has a wonderful opportunity for increased cooperation. With a new commissioner and a new head of the union, it is a perfect time to establish a dialogue and gain greater understanding among the different levels of the game. The NBA seems willing to make significant concessions to the players to get an increased age limit, and the NCAA would be well served to continue to search for creative ways to provide its players with incentive to stay in school longer. That includes finding creative ways to cooperate with the NBA on player development, if the NCAA truly believes additional years in school are the best thing for any player.

      Instead of constructing barriers to players staying in school — such as limiting practice time outside of the season — we should be looking for creative ways to keep them in school. If progress is made in that area, there won't be any real losers to an age increase.

      Jeff Goodman: It depends a bit on the specifics of the rule change, but it's a win-win for the game of basketball overall if the two sides can come to an agreement with the collective bargaining agreement and increase the minimum age limit in the NBA.

      One issue is that many kids come into college nowadays with the thought that they will only be there for a matter of months, so they are more focused on their draft stock than how they fit into a team. A two-year minimum stay would alter that thought process. It would also help the NBA game because the league would get players who are more mature and already have built a "brand" for two full seasons in the college ranks.

      However, we don't know whether high school players would be allowed to go directly to the NBA — as was the case years ago. There are a small number of players who are prepared to do so (e.g., LeBron James, Kobe Bryant), but there are also plenty of players who make mistakes. I would say that if they do opt to change the rule to one under which players can come out of high school or have to remain two seasons in college, we need to give those who do not get drafted an opportunity to still head to college. High school kids are not receiving the same level of quality information those in college are able to get. If we bar those kids from a shot at playing in college, they definitely would be on the losing end.

      The winners in all of this? Just about everyone. The NBA gets kids who are far more ready than they are after just one year in college. The players are more prepared to go into the NBA — physically and emotionally — and also will be more than halfway (including summer classes) toward their college degree. The only ones I worry about are the high school kids who just don't have the proper information to make a well-informed decision, but that can be rectified by the NBA and the NCAA agreeing to give those kids a chance to still attend college.

      RECOMMEND41TWEET1COMMENTS28EMAILPRINTInsiderSUBSCRIBE

      Jay Bilas
      College Basketball analyst
      Archive
      College basketball analyst for ESPN and ESPN Insider
      Played and coached at Duke
      Practicing attorney

      Jeff Goodman
      ESPN Insider
      FollowArchive
      Joined ESPN as a college basketball Insider in June 2013
      Previously wrote for CBSSports.com and FOXSports.com
      SPONSORED HEADLINES
      How Many Olympic Athletes Are Representing Your State? (NY Times)
      Top 10 Tallest Active NBA Players (The Richest)
      Dwyane Wade Admits His "Life Mistakes" Almost Made Him "Lose" Gabrielle Union (E! Online)
      The Best NBA Players Who Were Never All-Stars (The Richest)
      2014 NFL Free Agency Winners/Losers (Dailymotion)
      10 Of The Most Overrated Athletes Of All Time (Sporty Insider)
      Sponsored Links from Outbrain [?]
      MORE MEN'S COLLEGE BASKETBALL HEADLINES
      DePaul stuns Georgetown in Big East opener
      Auburn fires coach Barbee after 4 seasons
      American rocks Boston for Patriot title, berth
      NCAA: No 'Sic 'Em Bears' jerseys for Baylor
      MOST SENT STORIES ON ESPN.COM
      Reilly: Buffett's bet you won't have a perfect bracket
      Reilly: Jim Kelly patiently endures cancer, loss
      Sources: Revis, Pats agree to 1-year deal
      Source: Ware, Broncos agree to $30M deal
      Comments

      Use a Facebook account to add a comment, subject to Facebook's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your Facebook name, photo & other personal information you make public on Facebook will appear with your comment, and may be used on ESPN's media platforms. Learn more.

  12. יאיר

    13 מרץ 2014 11:42:38

    לא צריך שום כתבה משום מגזין נחשב או לא נחשב בשביל להוכיח שיש טנקינג, גם לא צריך שאף אחד יגיד את זה. פשוט צריך לראות את הסיקסרס משחקים..

  13. מומי שאוהב חציל בטחינה

    13 מרץ 2014 15:26:56

    מומי ראת תמונה של קובי וחשב שאולי הוא חוזר
    קובי השנה כמו הצ'קים של סמי חזיזיה , אף פעם לא חוזרים
    למומי יש סמארטפון אייפד , זה טוב לא ?

  14. מנחם לס

    13 מרץ 2014 16:06:26

    ,תגובות למאמר של הראיון עם סילבר:

    Also post on Facebook
    Posting as Menahem Less (Not you?)

    Mitchell Swirth · Top Commenter · Mover at Two Men and a Truck
    Yes it's great for the NBA and great for NCAAM..but it's not good for many of the kids. Some of the kids it is good for even if they dont know it. But the kids it hurts are the kids who know they are good enough (and actually are) for the NBA. It ends up costing them money and lots of it. What if they get hurt in a second year of college and they drop draft boards and lose millions because of it? With that said, I do believe they should make it 2 years. The benefits the NCAAM would see would be off the charts. More parity would be created. 5 of the top 15 recruits wouldn't be heading to the same team (Kentucky, Duke, Kansas) year after year after year. They would want to showcase and begin choosing other teams where they wouldnt have to wait behind sophomores who are forced to stay another year. NCAAM would be the primary beneficiaries, followed by the NBA, followed by kids who have no business entering the draft after 1 year overseas or in college while it would be horrible for the few NBA ready players who finish 1 year of college.
    Reply · 2 · Like · Follow Post · March 11 at 12:37pm

    Jack Hagmeier · Top Commenter · Derby, Kansas
    give me a brake, cost them money get real. they have to wait one more year to get their billions.
    Reply · Like · March 11 at 2:52pm

    Mitchell Swirth · Top Commenter · Mover at Two Men and a Truck
    Jack Hagmeier ha, was the billions a typo? i hope so. and not sure how you dont see that it is indeed costing them money. yes 1 more year, 1 more year of not making 5-6 mil. increased odds of having a severe injury while in college. are you blind to reality? nobody here is disputing the fact these guys make a lot of money when it is all said and done.
    Reply · 1 · Like · March 11 at 3:00pm

    Bryce H Hufford · Top Commenter · University of Oregon
    Jack Hagmeier imagine if you tore an acl in year two….

    and "billions" LOL u sound like one of those people bitter that top athletes make millions
    Reply · 1 · Like · March 11 at 3:09pm
    View 2 more

    Bill Du Bois · Assistant Professor at Southwest Minnesota State University
    Anybody that wants to change the age limit to 20 is just a moron like Jay Bilas who knows nothing about the NBA. Would LeBron James, Kevin Garrett, Dwight Howard and Kobe Bryant have been forbidden from two years on the league? Just because Michael Jordan chose Kwame Brown shouldn’t mean that 18 year olds don’t out. This is all about owners not taking any chance with paying a contract. Consider that college graduates (see Christan Latner or Stacy King) often don’t work. Don’t deprive fans from seeing LeBron, Garrnet, Dwight and Kobe. Shame on anyone for even suggesting a age limit.
    Reply · 1 · Like · Follow Post · March 11 at 2:36pm

    James Boothe · Top Commenter · Creative Advertising at Warner Bros. Entertainment
    What fans? NBA fans? Or college basketball fans? Are you saying NBA fans are a higher priority than college fans? There's only one moron here…sorry Southwest Minnesota State doesn't have the kind of program you can root for.
    Reply · 3 · Like · March 11 at 4:30pm

    Richard Lopez · Top Commenter · Salesman at Sports World Inc
    hey i agree bill du bois
    Reply · Like · March 11 at 4:47pm

    Marc Brauer · Top Commenter · Marquette University
    OF COURSE this is all about the owners and why shouldn't it be??? They're the ones paying these guys…it's their league, the players just play in it. And how much fun would it have been to see LeBron or Dwight crushing it in college?
    Reply · Like · March 11 at 5:05pm
    View 1 more

    Paul Newmeyer
    Not sure if this has been mentioned, but the winners would also be the non-Duke-Kentucky-Kansas-Arizona etc. schools. I believe a lot of these top players pick their schools based on the fact that the top prospects in the class before them will be gone and thus an open starting role for them. If they are required to stay two years, I think a lot of different choices would be made and the secondary colleges would start seeing the top prospects. This would make the college game all the better. Maybe a top 5 draft guarantee for freshman to enter the draft could be a concession. I hope there are no concessions and the age is changed. Don't forget all those veteran players who will get kicked off an NBA roster by those incoming frosh.
    Reply · Like · Follow Post · 18 hours ago

    Andrew Swihart
    INCREASING THE AGE LIMIT IS BETTER FOR THE FANS!!! The NBA and NCAAB are billion dollar businesses because of who? Not the players. Not the owners. Not the universities. THE FANS. This is a BUSINESS people! A business of selling tickets! Its called entertainment! No different than selling tickets to a concert, or a movie, or a play, or whatever. The ONLY goal in mind should be improving the product that is being sold to the people that make it all possible. If basketball fans got together and boycotted the NBA and the league's money dried up, guess what happens. NO ONE MAKES A DIME AND ITS ALL OVER. One and done players simply just become DONE. It shouldn't matter what the players want, or what the coaches want, or what anyone employed by Big Basketball wants. Just like any other business in the world, the only question should be, " What do the CUSTOMERS want?" Increasing the age limit makes for BETTER BASKETBALL at both the college and pro levels, and that is all that should matter.
    Reply · Like · Follow Post · Edited · March 11 at 1:26pm

    Bryce H Hufford · Top Commenter · University of Oregon
    The first answer to the question of who benefits most HAS TO BE the NCAA! The NCAA is the only person/entity that ALWAYS benefits from this idea. For some players this will only hinder their development. Certain guys like Rose, LeBron, BigAnt and many others will not develop as well playing agaisnt guys they have SUCH A DRASTIC physical advantage over. Those guys would be better off learning in an environment where they are playing with peers. Obviously there would be some guys who benefit and their are lots of potential benefits/downsides for all parties involved.

    My opinon: It should either stay the same or go to two mandatory years. I would strongly suggest they do not make it a junior year thing, like football. I also think this shouldn't happen because IMO players should be able to cash in when they are offered the opportu

כתיבת תגובה

סגירת תפריט